RxBulb

A medical AI that cites its clinical sources is aiming at the right problem — trust is the whole game in this category.

Passive launch-day check on rxbulb.com (headers + public HTML only):

The good: TLS 1.3, fast page (744 ms total, 274 ms TTFB), one clean H1, meta description present.

Findings worth a look before you pitch this to clinics:

1. All six core security headers are unset — HSTS, CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, Permissions-Policy. For a platform handling patient-adjacent questions, this set is the first thing a hospital IT/security review checks. HSTS (max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains) and nosniff are one config line each at your edge.

2. robots.txt and sitemap.xml both 404, and there's no canonical link. For a content-trust product, being un-crawlable on your own terms is leaving the launch's organic traffic on the table — both are single-file fixes.

3. Title tag is 76 chars — Google truncates around 60. "RxBulb — Medical AI Platform for Doctors & Patients" alone is 52; the "Cited Clinical Answers" tail is the part that gets cut, which is a shame because it's your differentiator. Consider leading with it.

Happy to re-run the check free once patched. Good luck with the launch!